Romanian Journal of Comparative Law nr. 1/2017

TABLE OF CONTENTS I. CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT DOIT-ON ENCORE REVISER LA CONSTITUTION NATIONALE POUR REPONDRE AUX EXIGENCES DU DROIT DE L’UNION EUROPEENNE? RALUCA BERCEA II. ARTICLES HOW CAN LEGAL HISTORY CONTRIBUTE TO COMPARATIVE LAW? OR ON HOW TWO “ANCILLARY” DISCIPLINES CAN JOIN TO UNDERMINE “THE DISCIPLINE” ALEXANDRA MERCESCU EXPRESSIONS OF RULES AND FALSIFIABLE STATEMENTS IN THE US SUPREME COURT’S JUDGMENT FOSTER COSMIN VADUVA LE MODELE STANDARD DE DEVELOPPEMENT DU DROIT PAR LE JUGE EN ALLEMAGNE REMUS ȚIȚIRIGA III. BOOK REVIEWS VERFASSUNGSKONFLIKTE ZWISCHEN POLITIK UND RECHT IN SÜDOSTEUROPA BULGARIEN UND RUMÄNIEN NACH 1989 IM VERGLEICH, by Michael Hein, Baden-Baden, Nomos, 2013 Reviewed by BOGDAN IANCU DE L’ETAT NATIONAL A L’UNION EUROPEENNE. LES ECRITS D’UNE JURISTE ROUMAINE ET EUROPEENNE, GENOVEVA VRABIE. Rainer Arnold, Didier Maus (coord.), Universitäsverlag Regensburg, 2013 Reviewed by BIANCA SELEJAN-GUTAN 6 RALUCA BERCEA IV. EVENTS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE AND ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING, EUROPEAN LAW FACULTY ASSOCIATION, MÜNSTER, 2013 Pagina:

OPINIA CITITORILOR